Wireshark mailing list archives
ew function(s) proto_tree_new_item_get_val_..()
From: Anders Broman <a.broman () telia com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 20:51:43 +0100
Hi,Wouldn't it be handy to have a proto_tree_new_item_get_val_ which would return the value thus avoiding to having do tvb_get_.. in conjunction with proto_tree_new_item() when the value
is needed in a dissector?Would an function per field type be necessary? like proto_tree_new_item_get_val_int32, proto_tree_new_item_get_val_uint32 etc or is there a smarter way of doing it?
Any one interested in implementing it? Regards Anders ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- ew function(s) proto_tree_new_item_get_val_..() Anders Broman (Jan 12)
- Re: ew function(s) proto_tree_new_item_get_val_..() Jaap Keuter (Jan 12)
- Re: ew function(s) proto_tree_new_item_get_val_..() Anders Broman (Jan 12)
- Re: ew function(s) proto_tree_new_item_get_val_..() Jaap Keuter (Jan 12)
- Re: ew function(s) proto_tree_new_item_get_val_..() Anders Broman (Jan 12)
- Re: ew function(s) proto_tree_new_item_get_val_..() Jeff Morriss (Jan 13)
- Re: ew function(s) proto_tree_new_item_get_val_..() Anders Broman (Jan 13)
- Re: ew function(s) proto_tree_new_item_get_val_..() Anders Broman (Jan 12)
- Re: ew function(s) proto_tree_new_item_get_val_..() Jaap Keuter (Jan 12)