Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: New DVB_CI dissector: Discussion as to approach
From: Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss.ws () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 10:17:24 -0500
Martin Kaiser wrote:
I uploaded a new version of the dvb-ci dissector to the bugtracker a week ago, fixing the issues you found when reviewing the code. Before that, I requested a DLT at the tcpdump workers list. Unfortunately, there's been no response yet. Any chance you can have a look and help me progress this? (Guy, are you assigning the DLT values?)
FWIW, my experience with tcpdump-workers has been that you must be subscribed in order for your email to go through. When I tried to send that list messages without being subscribed, I got (IIRC) silent discards.
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- New DVB_CI dissector: Discussion as to approach Bill Meier (Feb 10)
- Re: New DVB_CI dissector: Discussion as to approach Bill Meier (Feb 10)
- Re: New DVB_CI dissector: Discussion as to approach Bill Meier (Feb 10)
- Re: New DVB_CI dissector: Discussion as to approach Guy Harris (Feb 10)
- Re: New DVB_CI dissector: Discussion as to approach Martin Kaiser (Feb 11)
- Re: New DVB_CI dissector: Discussion as to approach Martin Kaiser (Feb 24)
- Re: New DVB_CI dissector: Discussion as to approach Jeff Morriss (Feb 25)
- Re: New DVB_CI dissector: Discussion as to approach Martin Kaiser (Feb 25)
- Re: New DVB_CI dissector: Discussion as to approach Bill Meier (Feb 10)