Wireshark mailing list archives
Fragmentation
From: Subhasree R <subhasree.r () aricent com>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 12:26:32 +0530
Hi, I am implementing one new protocol over TCP layer. I am implementing fragment_add_check() for fragmentation. In this protocol, there was no sequence id, i.e 4th parameter. Could you please help me how to check the upcoming packets as continous packets? In this protocol, the starting flag is 1 and the ending flag is 0. But ending flag is coming at the 8321 packet only. I want to display each packet as fragment 1, fragment 2, fragment n. Thanks, Subhasree ________________________________ "DISCLAIMER: This message is proprietary to Aricent and is intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged or confidential information and should not be circulated or used for any purpose other than for what it is intended. If you have received this message in error, please notify the originator immediately. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that you are strictly prohibited from using, copying, altering, or disclosing the contents of this message. Aricent accepts no responsibility for loss or damage arising from the use of the information transmitted by this email including damage from virus."
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Fragmentation Subhasree R (Feb 21)
- Re: Fragmentation Stephen Fisher (Feb 22)
- Re: Fragmentation David Aggeler (Feb 22)
- Re: Fragmentation Guy Harris (Feb 22)
- Re: Fragmentation Guy Harris (Feb 22)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Fragmentation Philip Gladstone (Feb 23)