Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Visual-Studio-Code-Analysis
From: Joerg Mayer <jmayer () loplof de>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 20:19:45 +0200
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 10:55:28AM -0700, buildbot-no-reply () wireshark org wrote:
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder Visual-Studio-Code-Analysis while building Wireshark (development). Full details are available at: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Visual-Studio-Code-Analysis/builds/1693 Buildbot URL: http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/ Buildslave for this Build: vs-code-analysis
Can the maintainers of the AIRPCAP code please have a look at this? prefs_dlg.c prefs_dlg.c(1105) : error C2220: warning treated as error - no 'object' file generated prefs_dlg.c(1105) : warning C4013: 'GTK_COMBO' undefined; assuming extern returning int prefs_dlg.c(1105) : error C2223: left of '->entry' must point to struct/union prefs_dlg.c(1105) : warning C4047: 'function' : 'GTypeInstance *' differs in levels of indirection from 'GType' prefs_dlg.c(1105) : warning C4024: 'g_type_check_instance_cast' : different types for formal and actual parameter 1 prefs_dlg.c(1105) : error C2198: 'g_type_check_instance_cast' : too few arguments for call Maybe replacing GTK_COMBO(x)->entry by GTK_COMBOBOX(x) is sufficient, but I'm not too optimistic. Ciao Joerg -- Joerg Mayer <jmayer () loplof de> We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Visual-Studio-Code-Analysis buildbot-no-reply (Aug 05)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Visual-Studio-Code-Analysis buildbot-no-reply (Aug 10)
- buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Visual-Studio-Code-Analysis buildbot-no-reply (Aug 12)
- buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Visual-Studio-Code-Analysis buildbot-no-reply (Aug 13)
- buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Visual-Studio-Code-Analysis buildbot-no-reply (Aug 13)
- buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Visual-Studio-Code-Analysis buildbot-no-reply (Aug 16)
- buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Visual-Studio-Code-Analysis buildbot-no-reply (Aug 17)
- Re: buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Visual-Studio-Code-Analysis Joerg Mayer (Aug 17)
- Re: buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Visual-Studio-Code-Analysis Stephen Fisher (Aug 17)
- Re: buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Visual-Studio-Code-Analysis Anders Broman (Aug 17)
- Re: buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Visual-Studio-Code-Analysis Stephen Fisher (Aug 18)
- Re: buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Visual-Studio-Code-Analysis Joerg Mayer (Aug 17)
- buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Visual-Studio-Code-Analysis buildbot-no-reply (Aug 24)
- buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Visual-Studio-Code-Analysis buildbot-no-reply (Aug 30)
- buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Visual-Studio-Code-Analysis buildbot-no-reply (Aug 31)
- buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Visual-Studio-Code-Analysis buildbot-no-reply (Aug 31)
- buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Visual-Studio-Code-Analysis buildbot-no-reply (Aug 31)
- buildbot failure in Wireshark (development) on Visual-Studio-Code-Analysis buildbot-no-reply (Aug 31)