Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: [Wireshark-commits] rev 38515: /trunk/gtk/ /trunk/gtk/: capture_dlg.c capture_if_dlg.c
From: Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 13:36:47 -0700
On Aug 13, 2011, at 1:26 PM, Stig Bjørlykke wrote:
What about displaying nothing in the interface list, and "none" in the details? Like in the attached patch.
That sounds good. Any objections? ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] rev 38515: /trunk/gtk/ /trunk/gtk/: capture_dlg.c capture_if_dlg.c Stig Bjørlykke (Aug 13)
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] rev 38515: /trunk/gtk/ /trunk/gtk/: capture_dlg.c capture_if_dlg.c Guy Harris (Aug 13)
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] rev 38515: /trunk/gtk/ /trunk/gtk/: capture_dlg.c capture_if_dlg.c Michael Tüxen (Aug 13)
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] rev 38515: /trunk/gtk/ /trunk/gtk/: capture_dlg.c capture_if_dlg.c Michael Tüxen (Aug 13)
- Re: [Wireshark-commits] rev 38515: /trunk/gtk/ /trunk/gtk/: capture_dlg.c capture_if_dlg.c Guy Harris (Aug 13)