Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: wireshark on 64 bit
From: sagar Guledagudda <sagu072 () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 12:42:26 +0530
i have done all those things. after that i am getting that linker error "unresolved external inflate_fast" On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Anders Broman <anders.broman () ericsson com>wrote:
** See http://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/Win64 more specificly: echo Setting up Visual Studio environment... call "c:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0\VC\vcvarsall.bat" x86_amd64 Regards Anders ------------------------------ *From:* wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org [mailto: wireshark-dev-bounces () wireshark org] *On Behalf Of *sagar Guledagudda *Sent:* den 1 augusti 2011 07:35 *To:* Developer support list for Wireshark *Subject:* Re: [Wireshark-dev] wireshark on 64 bit Yes i did that. i think this might be the problem with the gtk library . i am using the gtk package* gtk+-bundle_2.16.6-20100208_win6*4 . Is that a right one or we need to use any other version specifically for 64 bit.? Thanks Sags On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 1:15 AM, wsgd <wsgd () free fr> wrote:** Did you specify a parameter to say you want to produce 64 bits when calling vcvarsall.bat ? For VC++ 2008 EE on 64 bits windows, I use : "C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0\VC\bin\vcvars64.bat" Olivier Le 29/07/2011 09:40, sagar Guledagudda a écrit : hi, I am trying to compile the wireshark for target platform for 64 bit. When i do *nmake makefile.nmake *i get fallowing errror file_util.obj : fatal error LNK1112: module machine type 'X86' conflicts with ta rget machine type 'x64' NMAKE : fatal error U1077: '"c:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 8\VC\BIN\x 86_amd64\link.EXE"' : return code '0x458' i am using microsoft visual studio 2005. I have changed WIRESHARK_TARGET_PLATFORM to win64. and ran the batch file c:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 8\VC\vcvarsall.bat before doing any operation on wireshark. can any body help me to solve this issue ??? Is that problem with visual studio i am using ??? ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe <wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe> -- Wireshark Generic Dissector http://wsgd.free.fr ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org ?subject=unsubscribe___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: wireshark on 64 bit sagar Guledagudda (Aug 01)
- Re: wireshark on 64 bit Anders Broman (Aug 01)
- Re: wireshark on 64 bit sagar Guledagudda (Aug 02)
- Re: wireshark on 64 bit Anders Broman (Aug 02)
- Re: wireshark on 64 bit sagar Guledagudda (Aug 03)
- Re: wireshark on 64 bit Anders Broman (Aug 03)
- Re: wireshark on 64 bit sagar Guledagudda (Aug 03)
- Re: wireshark on 64 bit Anders Broman (Aug 03)
- Re: wireshark on 64 bit Guy Harris (Aug 04)
- Re: wireshark on 64 bit sagar Guledagudda (Aug 02)
- Re: wireshark on 64 bit Anders Broman (Aug 01)