Wireshark mailing list archives
答复: 答复: Is that a bug in packet-gsm_sms.c ?
From: "damker" <damker () sina com>
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 01:56:01 +0800
It is my fault ! I did not read 3GPP carefully , and assume that there's no need to add PI in RP-ERROR . I'm sorry for disturbing you . On Apr 3, 2011, at 10:22 AM, damker wrote:
Oh , in 3GPP TS 23.040 the PI is a Mandatory parameter .
Yes. It's mandatory for both SMS-DELIVER-REPORTs from RP-ERROR and SMS-DELIVER-REPORTs from RP-ACK, unlike the FCS, which is a Mandatory parameter only for SMS-DELIVER-REPORTs from RP-ERROR. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Wireshark : checking a new protocol ankit sambyal (Apr 02)
- Is that a bug in packet-gsm_sms.c ? damker (Apr 03)
- Re: Is that a bug in packet-gsm_sms.c ? Guy Harris (Apr 03)
- 答复: Is that a bug in packet-gsm_sms.c ? damker (Apr 03)
- Re: 答复: Is that a bug in packet-gsm_sms.c ? Guy Harris (Apr 03)
- 答复: 答复: Is that a bug in packet-gsm_sms.c ? damker (Apr 03)
- Re: Is that a bug in packet-gsm_sms.c ? Guy Harris (Apr 03)
- Is that a bug in packet-gsm_sms.c ? damker (Apr 03)