Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Wireshark-users Digest, Vol 59, Issue 8
From: Barry Constantine <Barry.Constantine () jdsu com>
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2011 12:05:35 -0700
Sure, but where do I post the capture file to? Thanks, Barry On Apr 10, 2011, at 3:02 PM, "wireshark-users-request () wireshark org" <wireshark-users-request () wireshark org> wrote:
Send Wireshark-users mailing list submissions to wireshark-users () wireshark org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to wireshark-users-request () wireshark org You can reach the person managing the list at wireshark-users-owner () wireshark org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Wireshark-users digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: VoIP RTP Analysis, Lost Packet Analysis (Jake Peavy) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2011 19:20:42 -0600 From: Jake Peavy <djstunks () gmail com> To: Community support list for Wireshark <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] VoIP RTP Analysis, Lost Packet Analysis Message-ID: <BANLkTi=5Ngzq5OJ6jx51VZ0UegZRRzLLFg () mail gmail com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 8:23 AM, Barry Constantine < Barry.Constantine () jdsu com> wrote:Hi, I am analyzing VoIP capture files in Wireshark 1.4 and am confused about the RTP analysis results. The jitter results match what I expect, but the packet loss results do not. I know for a fact that the file contains no packet loss and yet the RTP analysis screen reports all packets as lost ?negatively? (and gives an odd -100% value). Any ideas?Can you post a sample capture? -- -jp They were a proud people. In fact, some said they were too proud. If you asked them why they were so proud, they'd just laugh and say, "We're not even going to answer that." Later, they were tied to the bumper of a car and dragged around the block, as onlookers shrieked with delight. But one old man, who had a banjo, just shook his head and walked away. The crowd noticed this and set him on fire. deepthoughtsbyjackhandey.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users/attachments/20110409/bae58dd6/attachment.html> ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Wireshark-users mailing list Wireshark-users () wireshark org https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-users End of Wireshark-users Digest, Vol 59, Issue 8 **********************************************
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: Wireshark-users Digest, Vol 59, Issue 8 Barry Constantine (Apr 10)
- Re: Wireshark-users Digest, Vol 59, Issue 8 Boonie (Apr 10)
- Re: Wireshark-users Digest, Vol 59, Issue 8 j.snelders (Apr 11)
- Re: Wireshark-users Digest, Vol 59, Issue 8 Boonie (Apr 10)