Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: "Frame relay lapf not yet implemented"
From: Jaap Keuter <jaap.keuter () xs4all nl>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 14:42:06 +0200
On Tue, 26 Oct 2010 01:27:45 -0700, Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu> wrote:
On Oct 26, 2010, at 1:24 AM, Kevin Curtis wrote:FarSite produces a Line Monitor application for Synchronous serial links. There is an option to use Wireshark for the protocol decode, which many of our customers prefer. In the case of the Frame Relay protocol the Warning message "Frame relay lapf not yet implemented" is sometimes seen. Are there any plans to enhance Frame Relay support in future releases. If so are there any target milestones defined?http://www.wireshark.org/faq.html#q1.11 What goes into Wireshark, to a large degree, depends on what the community puts into it. We don't have formal roadmaps with plans for support for specific protocols.
..... So if FarSite is interested in helping its customers (and reducing service cost in the long run) it may be interesting for FarSite to develop such dissector itself and submit it for inclusion. Thanks, Jaap ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: "Frame relay lapf not yet implemented" Kevin Curtis (Oct 26)
- Re: "Frame relay lapf not yet implemented" Guy Harris (Oct 26)
- Re: "Frame relay lapf not yet implemented" Jaap Keuter (Oct 26)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- "Frame relay lapf not yet implemented" FarSite Support (Oct 26)
- Re: "Frame relay lapf not yet implemented" Guy Harris (Oct 26)
- Re: "Frame relay lapf not yet implemented" Guy Harris (Oct 26)