Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Wireshark 1.4
From: Stephen Fisher <steve () stephen-fisher com>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 22:09:47 -0600
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 08:30:24AM +0200, Jaap Keuter wrote:
Well, as long as there are some serious usability bugs[1] I would be presenting the old packet list to my users. I would like to see the attention going to addressing these issues, and, for now, leave the old code in.
Wow, there are still a lot of problems. The usability problems I've seen have mostly been fixed. But if there are this many problems still, we better leave it in as an option. I put countless hours into the new packet list before doing the first commit about 10 months ago, which built upon countless hours that Ulf had put into a prototype. Since then, countless more hours have been put into it by many others. I know our requirement for a packet list widget is on the complicated side, but it shouldn't be this hard. Stop letting us down, GTK... -- Steve ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: Wireshark 1.4, (continued)
- Re: Wireshark 1.4 Atcitty, Torrey (May 13)
- Re: Wireshark 1.4 Jaap Keuter (May 13)
- Message not available
- Re: Wireshark 1.4 Jaap Keuter (May 13)
- Re: Wireshark 1.4 Jaap Keuter (May 15)
- Re: Wireshark 1.4 Gerald Combs (May 16)
- Re: Wireshark 1.4 Stephen Fisher (May 16)
- Re: Wireshark 1.4 Jaap Keuter (May 16)
- Re: Wireshark 1.4 Stephen Fisher (May 17)