Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: The capture file appears to be damaged or corrupt. (pcap: Files has 109736-byte packet, bigger than maximum of 65535)
From: Joseph Laibach <jlaibach () schonfeld com>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 11:11:48 -0400
I open the file on the host that is was captured on, or I copy it via a Windows file share. Either way it gives me the same error. I'm capturing stock Market multicast data, if that matters. The traffic is very bursty and the data rate is around 200mb/sec. I switched from a Broadcom NIC to Intel NIC to see if that would help but no luck on that change either. -----Original Message----- From: wireshark-users-bounces () wireshark org [mailto:wireshark-users-bounces () wireshark org] On Behalf Of Sake Blok Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 10:49 AM To: Community support list for Wireshark Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] The capture file appears to be damaged or corrupt. (pcap: Files has 109736-byte packet, bigger than maximum of 65535) Did you open the file on the host on which it was captured? Or did you transfer the file from the capturing host to the host on which you try to read it? The error message that you get usually appears after the file has been transferred to another host with FTP in ASCII mode instead of BINARY mode. (FYI dumpcap writes libpcap based files which can not contain packets larger than 65535 bytes, so the file is most probably corrupted somehow) Cheers, Sake On 14 mei 2010, at 16:36, Joseph Laibach wrote:
Is there a way to remove the 65535 maximum from the reading of a capture? Thanks Joe -----Original Message----- From: wireshark-users-bounces () wireshark org [mailto:wireshark-users-bounces () wireshark org] On Behalf Of Joseph Laibach Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2010 11:36 AM To: Community support list for Wireshark Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] The capture file appears to be damaged or corrupt. (pcap: Files has 109736-byte packet, bigger than maximum of 65535) I'm running version 1.2.7 64bit. -----Original Message----- From: wireshark-users-bounces () wireshark org [mailto:wireshark-users-bounces () wireshark org] On Behalf Of Jaap Keuter Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2010 11:29 AM To: Community support list for Wireshark Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] The capture file appears to be damaged or corrupt. (pcap: Files has 109736-byte packet, bigger than maximum of 65535) But what release of Wireshark are you using? Thanks, Jaap Send from my iPhone On 11 mei 2010, at 16:37, Joseph Laibach <jlaibach () schonfeld com> wrote:I am having an issue with some of the capture files. Some captures files spit back an error that the capture file appears to be damaged or corrupt. The capture is running on a Windows 2003 Sever R2 64bit, with 2 gigs of memory and a Inetl Xeon 2.33ghz processor. I am capturing with dumpcap. The syntax I am using is as follows: C: \"Program Files"\Wireshark\dumpcap.exe -i \Device\NPF_ {ECC9D35A-826A-4A4F-B634-656EAD4EC7C9} -w d:\SFTI_capture -b files: 10000 -a filesize:8192 -B 128 -s 10000000 I added the -s 10000000 to try and fix the large byte packet issue b ut that hasn't worked. Anyone have any suggestions on how to eliminated the corruption of capture files? Thanks Joe Laibach This communication is for informational purposes only. It is not intended as an offer or solicitation or as an official confirmation. Market prices and other information are not guaranteed as to completeness or accuracy and are subject to change without notice. Schonfeld Group reserves the right to monitor and review the content of all messages sent to or from this e-mail address. ___________________________________________________________________________Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark orgArchives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe This communication is for informational purposes only. It is not intended as an offer or solicitation or as an official confirmation. Market prices and other information are not guaranteed as to completeness or accuracy and are subject to change without notice. Schonfeld Group reserves the right to monitor and review the content of all messages sent to or from this e-mail address. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe This communication is for informational purposes only. It is not intended as an offer or solicitation or as an official confirmation. Market prices and other information are not guaranteed as to completeness or accuracy and are subject to change without notice. Schonfeld Group reserves the right to monitor and review the content of all messages sent to or from this e-mail address. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe This communication is for informational purposes only. It is not intended as an offer or solicitation or as an official confirmation. Market prices and other information are not guaranteed as to completeness or accuracy and are subject to change without notice. Schonfeld Group reserves the right to monitor and review the content of all messages sent to or from this e-mail address. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- The capture file appears to be damaged or corrupt. (pcap: Files has 109736-byte packet, bigger than maximum of 65535) Joseph Laibach (May 11)
- Re: The capture file appears to be damaged or corrupt. (pcap: Files has 109736-byte packet, bigger than maximum of 65535) Jaap Keuter (May 11)
- Re: The capture file appears to be damaged or corrupt. (pcap: Files has 109736-byte packet, bigger than maximum of 65535) Joseph Laibach (May 11)
- Re: The capture file appears to be damaged or corrupt. (pcap: Files has 109736-byte packet, bigger than maximum of 65535) Joseph Laibach (May 14)
- Re: The capture file appears to be damaged or corrupt. (pcap: Files has 109736-byte packet, bigger than maximum of 65535) Sake Blok (May 14)
- Re: The capture file appears to be damaged or corrupt. (pcap: Files has 109736-byte packet, bigger than maximum of 65535) Joseph Laibach (May 14)
- Re: The capture file appears to be damaged or corrupt. (pcap: Files has 109736-byte packet, bigger than maximum of 65535) Sake Blok (May 14)
- Re: The capture file appears to be damaged or corrupt. (pcap: Files has 109736-byte packet, bigger than maximum of 65535) Joseph Laibach (May 14)
- Re: The capture file appears to be damaged or corrupt. (pcap: Files has 109736-byte packet, bigger than maximum of 65535) Joseph Laibach (May 14)
- Re: The capture file appears to be damaged or corrupt. (pcap: Files has 109736-byte packet, bigger than maximum of 65535) Joseph Laibach (May 17)
- Re: The capture file appears to be damaged or corrupt. (pcap: Files has 109736-byte packet, bigger than maximum of 65535) Sake Blok (May 17)
- Re: The capture file appears to be damaged or corrupt. (pcap: Files has 109736-byte packet, bigger than maximum of 65535) Joseph Laibach (May 17)
- Re: The capture file appears to be damaged or corrupt. (pcap: Files has 109736-byte packet, bigger than maximum of 65535) Sake Blok (May 17)
- Re: [Wireshark-users] The capture file appears to be damaged or corrupt. (pcap: Files has 109736-byte packet, bigger than maximum of 65535) Joseph Laibach (May 17)
- Re: The capture file appears to be damaged or corrupt. (pcap: Files has 109736-byte packet, bigger than maximum of 65535) Joseph Laibach (May 11)
- Re: The capturefile appears to be damaged or corrupt. (pcap: Fileshas 109736-byte packet, bigger than maximum of 65535) Gianluca Varenni (May 17)
- Re: The capturefile appears to be damaged or corrupt. (pcap: Fileshas 109736-byte packet, bigger than maximum of 65535) Sake Blok (May 17)
- Re: The capture file appears to be damaged or corrupt. (pcap: Files has 109736-byte packet, bigger than maximum of 65535) Jaap Keuter (May 11)