Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: One NIC on public side
From: "Gianluca Varenni" <gianluca.varenni () cacetech com>
Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 16:32:50 -0700
Did you install WinPcap? WinPcap must be installed in order to capture. Do the NICs get listed in wireshark? GV -------------------------------------------------- From: <mike () grounded net> Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2010 4:30 PM To: "wireshark-users" <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-users] One NIC on public side
Ok, just noticed that on new system, after installing wireshark, there are no capture protocols on either nic. Guess that's a lead. On Thu, 13 May 2010 11:43:23 -0500, mike () grounded net wrote:Just wanting to understand what I'm doing. Always good to learn rather than simply being told :).MS client gets disabled if you disable TCP/IP. QoS can be disabled as well. The network monitors can be left on.Because it is a netbios based service, which rides on tcp/ip?You are disabling TCP/IP on the public NIC. The LAN NIC will have its own IP address, the public one will not. As far as "safely connect" is concerned, it depends on what you mean by "safely".Yes, the server has two NICs. I have one connected on the LAN side for server admin, etc, the other is connected to a hub which has the WAN connections coming into it, just before the firewall. I want to see what hits us before the firewall does anything with it. It helps a lot when trying to figure out various problems. What do I mean by safely? Meaning that public cannot gain access to the server in some way. I mean, the setup bypasses the firewall so sure don't want someone being able to gain access into the lan somehow. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- One NIC on public side mike () grounded net (May 12)
- Re: One NIC on public side Terry Martin (May 12)
- Re: One NIC on public side mike () grounded net (May 12)
- Re: One NIC on public side Gianluca Varenni (May 13)
- Re: One NIC on public side mike () grounded net (May 13)
- Re: One NIC on public side Gianluca Varenni (May 13)
- Re: One NIC on public side mike () grounded net (May 13)
- Re: One NIC on public side Gianluca Varenni (May 13)
- Re: One NIC on public side mike () grounded net (May 13)
- Re: One NIC on public side mike () grounded net (May 13)
- Re: One NIC on public side Gianluca Varenni (May 13)
- Re: One NIC on public side mike () grounded net (May 13)
- Re: One NIC on public side Gianluca Varenni (May 13)
- Re: One NIC on public side mike () grounded net (May 13)
- Re: One NIC on public side Gianluca Varenni (May 13)
- Re: One NIC on public side mike () grounded net (May 13)
- Re: One NIC on public side mike () grounded net (May 13)
- Re: One NIC on public side mike () grounded net (May 13)
- Re: One NIC on public side Terry Martin (May 12)
- Re: One NIC on public side mike () grounded net (May 13)
- Re: One NIC on public side Boonie (May 13)
- Re: One NIC on public side mike () grounded net (May 13)
- Re: One NIC on public side Boonie (May 13)