Re: fragment_add_..(), pinfo->src/dst, IP vs. TCP Session

[Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu>]

On Jul 11, 2010, at 9:56 AM, David Aggeler wrote:

> I'll probably will create a unique ID for this dissector, but is there 
> any desire to handle this in reassemble.c, so other TCP based dissectors 
> don't need to reinvent this?

There's no guarantee that the protocol in question is running atop TCP, so there won't be anything TCP-specific.

The DICOM dissector is already using the conversation mechanism to save state information.  A conversation_t has, as 
one of its members, a 32-bit integral field named "index", which is a "unique ID for conversation".  That could be used 
as the unique ID.

Alternatively, you could do as the IAX2 dissector does, and have separate fragment and reassembly tables for each 
conversation, attaching them as private data to the conversation.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe