Re: Failing to get my tree to show

[Kaul <mykaul () gmail com>]

On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 1:09 AM, Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu> wrote:

> On Jan 16, 2010, at 10:39 AM, Kaul wrote:
>
> > From README.developer:
> > "Wireshark distinguishes between the 2 modes with the proto_tree pointer"
>
> I'll look at rewriting that to clarify that they're not modes of operation
> of Wireshark, and that one must not make assumptions about when you'll be
> called with, or without, a protocol tree (other than "if Wireshark needs the
> entire tree, for whatever reason that might be, it'll pass a non-null
> pointer; otherwise, it might be null or it might be non-null, don't depend
> on either one").
>
> > Would posting the complete code help?
>
> Probably.

Thank you - attached.
The main dissectors starts at dissect_spice(), and relevant code in line 283
and on.

Thanks in advance,
Yaniv.


> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Attachment: packet-redc.c
Description:

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe