Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: nfs attrs
From: Mag Gam <magawake () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 20:56:53 -0500
This works, is there a way to reduce the size of my dump? Basically, I just want these stats but really not the data. On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 8:42 PM, Guy Harris <guy () alum mit edu> wrote:
On Feb 18, 2010, at 5:34 PM, Mag Gam wrote:I am currently doing a tcpdump (tcpdump -i eth1 -w /tmp/out).Try tcpdump -i eth1 -s 65535 -w /tmp/out instead. Otherwise, you will be capturing only the first 68 or 96 bytes of the packet, so Wireshark won't be able to see very much of the NFS request or response. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- nfs attrs Mag Gam (Feb 18)
- Re: nfs attrs Guy Harris (Feb 18)
- Re: nfs attrs Mag Gam (Feb 18)
- Re: nfs attrs Mag Gam (Feb 18)
- Re: nfs attrs Guy Harris (Feb 18)
- Re: nfs attrs Guy Harris (Feb 18)
- Re: nfs attrs Mag Gam (Feb 18)
- Re: nfs attrs Guy Harris (Feb 18)
- Re: nfs attrs Mag Gam (Feb 18)
- Re: nfs attrs Guy Harris (Feb 18)
- Re: nfs attrs Mag Gam (Feb 18)
- Re: nfs attrs Guy Harris (Feb 18)