Wireshark mailing list archives
Suggestions for dissectors in need of reworking?
From: Henry Ludemann <henry () protocollogic com>
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 23:05:06 +0800
Hi! Are there any dissectors that are in any particular need of re-writing or re-working? I've been working on a higher level protocol specification format (http://www.protocollogic.com/), and would like to try it out with some more protocols (with the possibility that the resultant decoder may be put to use, instead of just as a logical exercise). I've used it to (partially) decode several formats, some binary (jpeg, pdf, ber asn.1), some text based (that are highly structured). The constructs are loosely based on ASN.1. Protocol suggestions & flames welcome! Cheers, Henry ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Suggestions for dissectors in need of reworking? Henry Ludemann (Feb 09)
- Re: Suggestions for dissectors in need of reworking? Maynard, Chris (Feb 09)
- Re: Suggestions for dissectors in need of reworking? Henry Ludemann (Feb 09)
- Re: Suggestions for dissectors in need of reworking? Maynard, Chris (Feb 10)
- Re: Suggestions for dissectors in need of reworking? Henry Ludemann (Feb 09)
- Re: Suggestions for dissectors in need of reworking? Maynard, Chris (Feb 09)