Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Does libwsutil need to be its own library?
From: Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss.ws () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2010 18:41:44 -0500
On 12/03/2010 06:30 PM, Stephen Fisher wrote:
Does libwsutil need to be its own library that is installed (on Unix) alongside libwireshark and libwiretap?
I think it's useful: it gives us a place that is neither wiretap nor libwireshark to stick basic utility-type or otherwise shared code. Making it a shared library that is installed separately just means we don't have 6 (or however many) copies of the code in each executable. Why? ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Does libwsutil need to be its own library? Stephen Fisher (Dec 03)
- Re: Does libwsutil need to be its own library? Jeff Morriss (Dec 03)
- Re: Does libwsutil need to be its own library? Stephen Fisher (Dec 03)
- Re: Does libwsutil need to be its own library? Guy Harris (Dec 03)
- Re: Does libwsutil need to be its own library? Jeff Morriss (Dec 06)
- Re: Does libwsutil need to be its own library? Stephen Fisher (Dec 03)
- Re: Does libwsutil need to be its own library? Jeff Morriss (Dec 03)