Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: MSS=1262
From: Hansang Bae <for_list_hbae () nyc rr com>
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 22:09:35 -0500
On 12/14/2010 3:23 AM, vincent paul wrote:
Hi All,Is there any rationale ( security "protocol" or something...) to use MSS= 1212, 1260 or 1262?Regards, Vincent
Like Sake said, it could be folks who are worried about MTU issues. There should be a law passed to force everyone to get path mtu discovery to work!
Between IPSec, GRE, IPSEC+GRE, etc., it's not unusual to see MSS in the 1300 range.
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: A way to see how many diffrent files are acessed using SMB/CIFS Martin Visser (Dec 11)
- MSS=1262 vincent paul (Dec 14)
- Re: MSS=1262 Sake Blok (Dec 14)
- Re: MSS=1262 Hansang Bae (Dec 20)
- MSS=1262 vincent paul (Dec 14)