Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: Wireshark Source Code
From: Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss.ws () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 13:19:59 -0500
Stephen Fisher wrote:
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 06:20:36PM +0200, Sam Stephenson wrote:We are moving system to RHEL5 (RHEL5.5 specifically), and yes, RHEL5.5 has included version wireshark-1.0.8-1.el5_3.1.Is that the latest version of Red Hat Enterprise Linux? Wireshark 1.0.8 is really old both by date (May 2009) and features, not to mention security vulnerabilities (search http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/search for wireshark).
Redhat EL 5 goes as far as 1.0.15. Redhat EL 6 (just released a few weeks ago) is on 1.2.something I think. Especially for their EL product, Redhat doesn't change versions much, instead backporting fixes as necessary; I'm sure they've been a fan of Wireshark's (relatively) recent release/branching policy. Admittedly RHEL 6 probably "should" have had 1.4. <sigh> ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Wireshark Source Code Sam Stephenson (Dec 18)
- Re: Wireshark Source Code Jeff Morriss (Dec 18)
- Re: Wireshark Source Code Sam Stephenson (Dec 20)
- Re: Wireshark Source Code Jeff Morriss (Dec 20)
- Re: Wireshark Source Code Sam Stephenson (Dec 20)
- Re: Wireshark Source Code Stephen Fisher (Dec 20)
- Re: Wireshark Source Code Jeff Morriss (Dec 20)
- Re: Wireshark Source Code Jeff Morriss (Dec 18)