Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: about Packet loss in wireshark


From: Martin Visser <martinvisser99 () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 08:52:14 +1100

Wireshark only discards traffic on an interface on the basis for the capture
filters. There are no random discard filters (or other math-like ones that
would be suitable.

If I want to simulate a lossy network, I use the "netem" functionality built
into to the Linux kernel to good effect. (Basically you setup a Linux box as
a bridge and then use the "tc" commands to alter the traffic control
paramters of the interfaces.

Regards, Martin

MartinVisser99 () gmail com


On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 2:17 AM, nangergong <nangergong () gmail com> wrote:

Hi, all:

  I captured some packets in my experiment. Is it possible to randomly
discard some packets with a certain probability from the captured packets
using wireshark?

  Besides, does anyone know the meaning of "minus packet loss" in
wireshark, as shown in the attached pktloss.jpg? Thank you!

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
            mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org
?subject=unsubscribe

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users
             mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread: