Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: How to avoid dissection based on port defined by a different dissector?
From: Dirk Jagdmann <doj () cubic org>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 21:21:25 -0800
Sorry, I didn't make it clear that "what RFC that is" is "what RFC - if any - says that ephemeral ports should be handed out by default", not "what RFC explains what SHOULD and MUST mean". *Is* there an RFC that describes well-known, registered, and ephemeral ports? The first two of them are mentioned in the IANA port number assignment list: http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers but that doesn't mention ephemeral ports.
There probably is not RFC to define that, and remember that different operating systems have different default ranges and you can typically override those defaults. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ephemeral_port -- ---> Dirk Jagdmann ----> http://cubic.org/~doj -----> http://llg.cubic.org ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] How to avoid dissection based on port defined by a different dissector?, (continued)
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] How to avoid dissection based on port defined by a different dissector? Christopher Maynard (Dec 15)
- Re: How to avoid dissection based on port defined by a different dissector? Stephen Fisher (Dec 15)
- Re: How to avoid dissection based on port defined by a different dissector? Stephen Fisher (Dec 15)
- Re: How to avoid dissection based on port defined by a different dissector? Christopher Maynard (Dec 15)
- Re: How to avoid dissection based on port defined by a different dissector? Jeff Morriss (Dec 15)
- Re: How to avoid dissection based on port defined by a different dissector? Dirk Jagdmann (Dec 15)
- Re: How to avoid dissection based on port defined by a different dissector? Stephen Fisher (Dec 16)
- Re: How to avoid dissection based on port defined by a different dissector? Guy Harris (Dec 15)
- Re: [Wireshark-dev] How to avoid dissection based on port defined by a different dissector? Chris Maynard (Dec 15)
- Re: How to avoid dissection based on port defined by a different dissector? Guy Harris (Dec 15)
- Re: How to avoid dissection based on port defined by a different dissector? Dirk Jagdmann (Dec 15)
- Re: How to avoid dissection based on port defined by a different dissector? Jeff Morriss (Dec 16)
- Re: How to avoid dissection based on port defined by a different dissector? Stephen Fisher (Dec 15)
- Re: How to avoid dissection based on port defined by a different dissector? Stephen Fisher (Dec 16)