Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: [Wireshark-users] a little bug(maybe not a bug,m3ua padding treated as malformed packet)
From: "damker" <damker () sina com>
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 00:07:36 +0800
3gpp 24008-930 10.5.1.7 said that: ... { 0 | 1 < High Multislot Capability : bit(2) > } --Release 5 starts here. { 0 | 1 < GERAN Iu Mode Capabilities > } < GERAN Feature Package 2 : bit > < GMSK Multislot Power Profile : bit (2) > < 8-PSK Multislot Power Profile : bit (2) > { 0 | 1 < T-GSM 400 Bands Supported : { 01 | 10 | 11 } > -- Release 6 starts here. < T-GSM 400 Associated Radio Capability: bit(4) > } 0 -- The value '1' was allocated in an earlier version of the protocol and shall not be used. ... This means that the present protocol used in my network is for release 5, and the Wireshark(Version 1.3.3) supports the last release. Thanks Jeff To reply Yida : I don't know what your malformed packet is .for my network, the sample packet is treated as correct packet. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- WS1.2.10; Mac OS X 10.6.4; Quartz 2.5.2; WS did´n come up Thomas Knebel (Aug 06)
- Re: WS1.2.10; Mac OS X 10.6.4; Quartz 2.5.2; WS did´n come up Michael Tuexen (Aug 06)
- Re: WS1.2.10; Mac OS X 10.6.4; Quartz 2.5.2; WS did´n come up Thomas Knebel (Aug 06)
- Re: WS1.2.10; Mac OS X 10.6.4; Quartz 2.5.2; WS did´n come up Michael Tuexen (Aug 07)
- Re: WS1.2.10; Mac OS X 10.6.4; Quartz 2.5.2; WS did´n come up Thomas Knebel (Aug 07)
- Re: WS1.2.10; Mac OS X 10.6.4; Quartz 2.5.2; WS did´n come up Michael Tuexen (Aug 07)
- Re: WS1.2.10; Mac OS X 10.6.4; Quartz 2.5.2; WS did´n come up Thomas Knebel (Aug 06)
- Re: WS1.2.10; Mac OS X 10.6.4; Quartz 2.5.2; WS did´n come up Guy Harris (Aug 09)
- Re: WS1.2.10; Mac OS X 10.6.4; Quartz 2.5.2; WS did´n come up Michael Tuexen (Aug 06)
- Re: [Wireshark-users] a little bug(maybe not a bug,m3ua padding treated as malformed packet) Yida Gao (Aug 06)
- Re: a little bug(maybe not a bug,m3ua padding treated as malformed packet) Jeff Morriss (Aug 06)
- Re: [Wireshark-users] a little bug(maybe not a bug,m3ua padding treated as malformed packet) damker (Aug 09)