Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: dumpcap -f question [Re: Can I get Wireshark to capture constantly, but not count to infinity ?]
From: Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss.ws () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 09:21:36 -0400
Gregorio Tomas Focaccio wrote:
Phil, Thanks for the dumpcap tip, it looks like a near perfect fit to my needs. You are right about a ring-buffer being superior to 'clearing the slate', that is what I wanted, but didn't have a word for it. I wish there was a way to configure a ring-buffer within Wireshark.
There is: in the capture options window, select "Use multiple files" and make sure "Ring buffer with [N] files" is selected. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- dumpcap -f question [Re: Can I get Wireshark to capture constantly, but not count to infinity ?] Gregorio Tomas Focaccio (Aug 24)
- Re: dumpcap -f question [Re: Can I get Wireshark to capture constantly, but not count to infinity ?] Guy Harris (Aug 24)
- Re: dumpcap -f question [Re: Can I get Wireshark to capture constantly, but not count to infinity ?] Phil Paradis (Aug 24)
- Re: dumpcap -f question [Re: Can I get Wireshark to capture constantly, but not count to infinity ?] Jeff Morriss (Aug 25)