Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: What's wrong with 1.3?
From: Joerg Mayer <jmayer () loplof de>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 00:16:57 +0100
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 10:58:35PM +0100, David Aggeler wrote:
I now have the latest 1.2 and the latest 1.3 SVNs in parallel use. with the exact same copy of packet-dcm.c. In 1.2 things behave as expected (both with 1.2 and 1.3 version packet-dcm.c). In 1.3 I had yesterday: - Debugging problems in MSEE (function is terminated somewhere in the middle) - Setting a simple int in a structure causes a crash (heap error) I'd usually contribute this to accessing deallocated memory, but why does the same thing work in 1.2? I'd also say, that about two month ago, I did not see this in 1.3. Today I get an a DISSECOTOR_ASSERT_NOT_REACHED in a super simple proto_tree_add_int_format() tvb is 28670 bytes long, the offset is only 622 and I'd like to mark 4 bytes. Is this to be expected with coding work going on?
There is one thing that may have changed between 1.2 and 1.3: Maybe the type in the hf field is no longer acceptable. The required field types are checked more strictly in 1.3. HTH Joerg -- Joerg Mayer <jmayer () loplof de> We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- What's wrong with 1.3? David Aggeler (Nov 12)
- Re: What's wrong with 1.3? Stig Bjørlykke (Nov 12)
- Re: What's wrong with 1.3? David Aggeler (Nov 12)
- Re: What's wrong with 1.3? Joerg Mayer (Nov 12)
- Re: What's wrong with 1.3? David Aggeler (Nov 16)
- Re: What's wrong with 1.3? Stig Bjørlykke (Nov 12)