WebApp Sec mailing list archives

Re: OS XSS and SQL scanner


From: "Dean H. Saxe" <dean () fullfrontalnerdity com>
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 03:14:37 -0400

Here, here, Arian.

Let's see the web app scanner folks go up against a manual pen test and code review/threat model on a series of apps. One caveat: the results must be open for review, which means publishing the results in an open forum for all to see.

FWIW, I'm a former customer of SPIDynamics. I have experience web app scanners in an enterprise environment along with pen testing and code reviews. I have a good idea how things will shake out: Web app scanners are inexpensive to run but don't find significant numbers of vulnerabilities. Pen tests are a decent measure of security at a reasonable cost when performed my talented testers. Code review && threat model finds the most vulnerabilities at the highest cost when performed by talented reviewers.

Will any web app scanner companies actually subject their scanners to such a bake off? If not, how can we trust the marketing material? Was Gary McGraw right in calling these tools "badnessometers"?

I'm at BlackHat all week. Email me and we'll get together and chat. I'll be attending the WASC gathering at Shadow Bar tomorrow night. I hope to see some of you there.

-dhs

Dean H. Saxe, CISSP,  CEH
dean () fullfrontalnerdity com
"[T]he people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. This is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in every country."
    --Hermann Goering, Hitler's Reich-Marshall at the Nuremberg Trials


On Aug 1, 2006, at 2:35 PM, Arian J. Evans wrote:



-----Original Message-----
From: Mandeep Khera [mailto:mandeep () cenzic com]

I am sorry to hear that you perceive some problems with our
product. We take pride in being the most accurate product
with least amount of false positives in the industry. This
has been proven in many bake-offs by customers and
independent journalists.

Hate to take this a little off topic, but do you have any facts
that can support or back up these claims? Any data produced by
anyone competent that speaks to your "false positives" and also
your "false negatives"?

I have failed to read a review yet to date that contains useful
information. So far what I've read varies from useless data
organized around features like "reflective buttons" (e.g.-the
Acunetix review posted to this list written by some woman
who writes windows software articles) to the other extreme
of uninformed opinion and inability to keep features between
the products straight (secure enterprise computing review).
This includes infosec magazine and online reviews, bake-offs,
and Gartner-style evals. Every one I have read so far is garbage.

Not one covers actual tests run & and the how & why around them.

This situation is no doubt due to the utter lack of skill
and understanding of the subject on the part of the authors.

However, I think all on this list would welcome information
of a high-quality nature regarding scanner quality, if you
have anything like that to point us at.

-ae





---------------------------------------------------------------------- ---
Sponsored by: Watchfire

Do you test web applications for XSS, SQL Injections, Buffer Overflows,
Logical issues and other web application security threats? Why not
automate this work with Watchfire's AppScan, the world's leading
automated web application scanner. Download AppScan today!

https://www.watchfire.com/securearea/appscancamp.aspx? id=701300000008BP9 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ----



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsored by: Watchfire

Do you test web applications for XSS, SQL Injections, Buffer Overflows, Logical issues and other web application security threats? Why not automate this work with Watchfire's AppScan, the world's leading automated web application scanner. Download AppScan today!

https://www.watchfire.com/securearea/appscancamp.aspx?id=701300000008BP9
--------------------------------------------------------------------------


Current thread: