![webappsec logo](/images/webappsec-logo.png)
WebApp Sec mailing list archives
RE: PCI DSS Compliance
From: "Lyal Collins" <lyal.collins () key2it com au>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 09:33:30 +1100
If you read the PCI scanning requirements, any IPS/IDP solution MUST be disabled at least for the IP address conducting the vulnerability scan, for the duration of the test. See the documentation on scanning on sdp.mastercardintl.com, page 2-2 of "Security Scanning Requirements for Vendors." However, if it's a firewall that's actively blocking/locking out the port scanning IP, then maybe the port scan can be conducted slower to get under the threshold, or a firewall rule adjustment performed for the duration of the test period. PCI requires a accurate vulnerability scan. Any PCI accredited scanner provider would imho, be within their obligated rights to not issue a 'compliant' report in the event they can't perform a meaningful vulnerability test. Ultimately, I think its up to your client, the scanning company and youur firm to negotiate a way for a meaningful vulnerability scan to be conducted. Of course, it may be that the message they provided is boilerplate, and not accurately reporting the situation they see. My 2cents Lyal -----Original Message----- From: Ademar Gonzalez [mailto:ademar.gonzalez () gmail com] Sent: Wednesday, 14 December 2005 3:37 AM To: webappsec () securityfocus com Subject: PCI DSS Compliance A shared hosting client needs to get his site PCI DSS certified. He forwarded us the following request from the company doing the assessment. "Your site could not be certified. Your site appears to be running scan detection software, that has prevented a reliable port scan. This test is inconclusive. Please add our scanner ip: ##.##.##.## to your scan detection software exclusion list to allow our scanner to make a complete assessment of your system." Is this request plain stupid or what ? Comments ? I have deal with this kind of requests in the past and most of the time the people running this automated scans knows nothing at all about security nor anything else and it becomes a pain dealing with the client on one end that wants his website certified and the other guy on the security company that wants you to open your firewall so hi can run his nmap or whatever it is they run. It looks like the client runs the risk of not being certified 'cause his website is over-protected. How would you proceed in this situation ? ciao ciao ademar
Current thread:
- PCI DSS Compliance Ademar Gonzalez (Dec 14)
- Re: PCI DSS Compliance Richard Moore (Dec 15)
- Re: PCI DSS Compliance Roy Britten (Dec 16)
- RE: PCI DSS Compliance Michael Johnson (Dec 16)
- RE: PCI DSS Compliance Syed Mohamed A (Dec 16)
- Re: PCI DSS Compliance Pete Herzog (Dec 18)
- RE: PCI DSS Compliance Syed Mohamed A (Dec 16)
- RE: PCI DSS Compliance Lyal Collins (Dec 16)
- Re: PCI DSS Compliance Peter Watkins (Dec 16)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: PCI DSS Compliance Sebastien Deleersnyder (Dec 15)
- RE: PCI DSS Compliance Steve Kerns (Dec 15)
- Re: PCI DSS Compliance Ademar Gonzalez (Dec 15)
- RE: PCI DSS Compliance Lyal Collins (Dec 16)
- Re: PCI DSS Compliance Ademar Gonzalez (Dec 15)
- RE: PCI DSS Compliance Craig Wright (Dec 16)
- RE: PCI DSS Compliance Steven Jones (Dec 16)
- Re: PCI DSS Compliance null0 (Dec 18)
- RE: PCI DSS Compliance Craig Wright (Dec 18)
- Re: PCI DSS Compliance Pete Herzog (Dec 18)
(Thread continues...)