WebApp Sec mailing list archives
Re: BBCode [IMG] [/IMG] Tag Vulnerability
From: Paul Laudanski <zx () castlecops com>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 00:12:23 -0400 (EDT)
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005, Christopher Kunz wrote:
Or, you could just disallow remote images altogether. It kinda boils down to a security vs. feature set question...
This is very interesting indeed. I was originally approaching this 'problem' from a strictly local host perspective (where the website resides) rather than from a remote attack. You're reply set me straight on that one. There ought to be a more creative way to monitor this stuff than just moving it from GET to POST (and POST in itself is not fool proof). I'm going to munch on this. Paul http://castlecops.com ________ Information from Computer Cops, L.L.C. ________ This message was checked by NOD32 Antivirus System for Linux Mail Server. part000.txt - is OK http://castlecops.com
Current thread:
- Re: BBCode [IMG] [/IMG] Tag Vulnerability Paul Laudanski (Aug 22)
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Re: BBCode [IMG] [/IMG] Tag Vulnerability Christopher Kunz (Aug 22)
- Re: BBCode [IMG] [/IMG] Tag Vulnerability Paul Laudanski (Aug 22)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: BBCode [IMG] [/IMG] Tag Vulnerability Tony Stahler (Aug 23)
- Re: BBCode [IMG] [/IMG] Tag Vulnerability Zak McGregor (Aug 23)
- Re: BBCode [IMG] [/IMG] Tag Vulnerability Christopher Kunz (Aug 23)
- Re: BBCode [IMG] [/IMG] Tag Vulnerability Paul Laudanski (Sep 08)
- Re: BBCode [IMG] [/IMG] Tag Vulnerability Christopher Canova (Aug 27)
- Re: [Full-disclosure] Re: BBCode [IMG] [/IMG] Tag Vulnerability Christopher Kunz (Aug 22)