Re: New T&C poll: Was Lynn right?

[Nick Murison <nick () urgusabic net>]

Admittedly the poll has very little to do with web app security.  However,
T&C as a site does contain quite a lot on the subject.

On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 09:27:40AM -0700, Altheide, Cory B. (IARC) wrote:
> Maybe I'm missing something, but /what/ exactly does this have to do with
> web application security?
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Nick Murison [mailto:nick () urgusabic net] 
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 3:54 AM
> > To: full-disclosure () lists grok org uk; 
> > webappsec () securityfocus com; SC-L () securecoding org
> > Subject: New T&C poll: Was Lynn right?
> >
> >
> > (Yes, this is a shameless plug)
> >
> > Good morning everyone,
> >
> > Seen as the storm after BlackHat has settled a little, I 
> > thought it'd be nice to see what people had decided about 
> > Michael Lynn's presentation.  Was he right to go ahead with 
> > it, or was it really not his call?
> >
> > Judging from the security mailing lists, everyone and their 
> > dog has now had the opportunity to ramble on about the finer 
> > details of the situation.  At 
> > www.ThreatsAndCountermeasures.com, we just want some straight 
> > answers, so we made it the topic of our latest poll :)
> >
> > So go along to https://www.threatsandcountermeasures.com and 
> > submit your
> > vote:
> >
> > Was Lynn right to hold his BlackHat talk?
> > a) Yes, information should be free
> > b) Yes, to safeguard infrastructure
> > c) No, to safeguard infrastructure
> > d) No, he violated IP
> > e) Don't care
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Nick Murison (editor in chief) 
> > https://www.threatsandcountermeasures.com

-- 
Nicholas John Murison
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://www.urgusabic.net