WebApp Sec mailing list archives
Re: Automagic webapp testing tools
From: robert () dyadsecurity com
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 17:37:19 -0800
Evans, Arian(Arian.Evans () fishnetsecurity com)@Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 12:35:58PM -0600:
4. No substitute for manual testing.
In my mind, these tools are most powerful when used by the manual testers. It allows for a stimulus to be consistently applied to all inputs in the application the same way every time. No human has the stamina for that on a large app :). That said, the commercial tools I've evaluated are all lacking in important features. I think it's still an immature market with plenty of room for new players who have good ideas. Robert -- Robert E. Lee CTO, Dyad Security, Inc. W - http://www.dyadsecurity.com E - robert () dyadsecurity com M - (949) 394-2033
Current thread:
- Automagic webapp testing tools inflatablekiwi (Mar 09)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Automagic webapp testing tools Evans, Arian (Mar 13)
- Re: Automagic webapp testing tools robert (Mar 18)
- Re: Automagic webapp testing tools Leigh Morresi (Mar 20)
- Re: Automagic webapp testing tools robert (Mar 18)