WebApp Sec mailing list archives
RE: Finally - Curphey award 2004 to SPI Dynamics
From: "Mark Curphey" <mark () curphey com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:09:23 -0400
Mads, Credit where credit is due. A "black box" scanning company moving towards helping developers fix problems in the code rather than tell them they have an issue when its too late and too expensive to fix it. Put the open source debate aside, where is the downside in that ? They are doing the right thing and moving in the right direction and I think they should be commended so others do the same. The industry needs to move towards building better software. These things are a step in the right direction. This is of course hardly new. We have had the OWASP Common Library for Java since 2001 and OWASP also has another Java input validation library called Stinger (discussed at the OWASP conference). Good developers build libraries all the time. But this may mark a fundamental shift for a popular scanning company moving to helping developers to do the right thing rather than telling them they haven't done the right thing, and I think they should have a pat on the back. Clearly an input validation library alone will not secure an application. Data storage, access control etc all need to be taken care of. There is nothing stopping any development team building there own but many don't and so pre-packaged libraries that they can use must be seen as a better solution for those people. What am I missing here ? And yes there has been has been C# .NET code lurking around OWASP developers for a while to do this! -----Original Message----- From: Mads Rasmussen [mailto:mads () opencs com br] Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 7:47 AM To: Mark Curphey Cc: webappsec () securityfocus com; Jeff Williams Subject: Re: Finally - Curphey award 2004 to SPI Dynamics Mark Curphey wrote:
Here I am, depressed at the prospect of filling in mountains of expense claims from weeks of traveling and approving mundane mails to webappsec about XSS after XSS and along comes a shining light. At last an "application security" company that gets it ! Hats of to the folks at SPI and the Curphey Award for 2004 for leading the industry down the
right path !
http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/040628/clm006_1.html
Here is another link http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1617901,00.asp I don't know about you guys but I have a bad feeling about this. I am not sure this is the right path. The article quotes Caleb Sima, founder and chief technology officer of SPI Dynamics saying "It doesn't require developers to learn about security," - "You really just need to validate input to eliminate most application vulnerabilities." Shouldn't you at least have a feeling for where the developers makes their mistakes to be able to insert the right piece of secure code? By all means it looks like a cool product, but how much can we trust it? One of its features is, qoute "Input Validation objects will check incoming data on web forms to validate user-supplied input against a set of rules and prevent parameter manipulation exploits, such as SQL Injection attacks." Can we trust these "set of rules". If they opened their technology, the OWASP team could contribute rules to such a database and then we just might get somewhere by having a list of f.ex regular expressions for using the validator classes in .Net or input validation in general but that would probably not happen. I am concerned that products like this just leads to lazy developers. Jeff what do you think about this? You wanted to start an input validation project based on filters, a database like described above would be quite handy :o) Just my two bits -- Mads Rasmussen, M.Sc. Open Communications Security www.opencs.com.br +55 11 3345 2525
Current thread:
- Finally - Curphey award 2004 to SPI Dynamics Mark Curphey (Jun 28)
- Re: Finally - Curphey award 2004 to SPI Dynamics Mads Rasmussen (Jun 29)
- RE: Finally - Curphey award 2004 to SPI Dynamics Mark Curphey (Jun 29)
- Re: Finally - Curphey award 2004 to SPI Dynamics wirepair (Jun 29)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Finally - Curphey award 2004 to SPI Dynamics Stan Guzik (Jun 29)
- Re: Finally - Curphey award 2004 to SPI Dynamics Daniel Cuthbert (Jun 29)
- RE: Finally - Curphey award 2004 to SPI Dynamics Thomas Ryan (Jun 29)
- Re: Finally - Curphey award 2004 to SPI Dynamics Daniel Cuthbert (Jun 29)
- RE: Finally - Curphey award 2004 to SPI Dynamics Madsen, Villy (Jun 29)
- The Right Approach to Web Developer Education Mark Curphey (Jun 29)
- RE: The Right Approach to Web Developer Education Yvan Boily (Jun 29)
- The Right Approach to Web Developer Education Mark Curphey (Jun 29)
- RE: Finally - Curphey award 2004 to SPI Dynamics PPowenski (Jun 29)
- Re: Finally - [Logical vs. Technical] was Curphey award 2004 to SPI Dynamics Jeremiah Grossman (Jun 29)
- RE: [Logical vs. Technical] was Curphey award 2004 to SPI Dynamics Arian J. Evans (Jun 30)
- Re: Finally - [Logical vs. Technical] was Curphey award 2004 to SPI Dynamics Jeremiah Grossman (Jun 29)
(Thread continues...)
- Re: Finally - Curphey award 2004 to SPI Dynamics Mads Rasmussen (Jun 29)