Re: Reverse Proxy Server?

[Bob Lee <crazybob () crazybob org>]

On Tuesday, May 27, 2003, at 06:25 PM, Don Felgar wrote:
> Not true.  Granting a small set of IP's access to your server nearly
> nullifies the possibility of a portscanner discovering a vulnerability
> in your server.  It is much safer than not doing so.  That is not to
> say that you should forego passwords and encryption, if that's what
> you meant.
>
> It may or may not be scalable, depending on your situation.  NAT may
> not be a problem if you are granting access to an entire organization.
> Dynamic IP's are usually within a narrow range, so easily handled.
> Also ARP poisoning is an extra hurdle that the determined cracker has
> to get around.
>
> You should limit IP access to all services where it's practical.
>
> --Don

100% right. I read it too fast and missed that this was in addition to 
other authentication methods.

Bob