Vulnerability Development mailing list archives
Ports 0-1023?
From: Blue Boar <BlueBoar () thievco com>
Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2002 00:05:16 -0700
Is there any point in needing to be root in order to allocate the low ports on unix-like systems, anymore? Could we get away from having to have some daemons even have a root stub in order to listen on a low port? What would break, and what new holes would be created? Could some sort of port ACL simply be used that says a particular UID can allocate a particular range of ports?
Discuss. BB
Current thread:
- Ports 0-1023? Blue Boar (Jul 04)
- Re: Ports 0-1023? Kurt Seifried (Jul 04)
- Re: Ports 0-1023? Charles 'core' Stevenson (Jul 04)
- Re: Ports 0-1023? Thomas Cannon (Jul 04)
- Re: Ports 0-1023? Charles 'core' Stevenson (Jul 05)
- Re: Ports 0-1023? Brian Hatch (Jul 05)
- Re: Ports 0-1023? Kevin Easton (Jul 06)
- Re: Ports 0-1023? Charles 'core' Stevenson (Jul 06)
- Re: Ports 0-1023? Bruno Morisson (Jul 07)
- Re: Ports 0-1023? Brian Hatch (Jul 08)
- Re: Ports 0-1023? Bruno Morisson (Jul 08)
- Re: Ports 0-1023? Charles 'core' Stevenson (Jul 04)
- Re: Ports 0-1023? Kurt Seifried (Jul 04)