Vulnerability Development mailing list archives
Re: Vuln in Verisign PayFlow Link payment service
From: jon schatz <jon () divisionbyzero com>
Date: 03 Jan 2002 18:24:15 -0800
On Thu, 2002-01-03 at 16:12, Megan McRee wrote:
I would hate to see them change the way the current system of passing back values works. Does anyone know of any other card processing services that pass back variables to software/scripts in the same manner?
Verisign's PayFlowPro system is great. You get a c library, a Perl module (via swig), and a documented api. This way, you can code the processing into your system however you see fit. From a developer/admin perspective, the idea of a simple post/response handling a cc transaction scares the hell out of me... -jon -- jon () divisionbyzero com || www.divisionbyzero.com gpg key: www.divisionbyzero.com/pubkey.asc think i have a virus?: www.divisionbyzero.com/pgp.html "You are in a twisty little maze of Sendmail rules, all confusing."
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Vuln in Verisign PayFlow Link payment service Keith Royster (Jan 03)
- Re: Vuln in Verisign PayFlow Link payment service Megan McRee (Jan 03)
- Re: Vuln in Verisign PayFlow Link payment service jon schatz (Jan 03)
- Re: Vuln in Verisign PayFlow Link payment service Doru Petrescu (Jan 04)
- Re: Vuln in Verisign PayFlow Link payment service Megan McRee (Jan 05)
- Re: Vuln in Verisign PayFlow Link payment service Keith Royster (Jan 05)
- Re: Vuln in Verisign PayFlow Link payment service Megan McRee (Jan 05)
- Re: Vuln in Verisign PayFlow Link payment service Megan McRee (Jan 03)
- Re: Vuln in Verisign PayFlow Link payment service Keith Royster (Jan 04)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Vuln in Verisign PayFlow Link payment service Erwin Geirnaert (Jan 04)
- RE: Vuln in Verisign PayFlow Link payment service keith royster (Jan 04)