Vulnerability Development mailing list archives
Re: SUMMARY: SMB overflow attacks
From: Emeric Miszti <emeric () uksecurityonline com>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 10:19:36 +0100
On Thursday 29 Aug 2002 10:51 pm, Jason Coombs wrote:
SUMMARY: There does not appear to be any way to get Windows 2000 to stop binding to port 445 at this time. It's possible in Windows NT, but then again SMB was an after-thought for NT (Service Pack 3 or 4, I don't remember which) and the NT kernel doesn't bind port 445 as aggressively.
Have a look at http://www.uksecurityonline.com/husdg/windows2000/close445.htm and try the methods there. Works for me and everyone else who has done this. Hope this helps. Regards -- Emeric Miszti UK Security Online http://www.uksecurityonline.com Tel No: 0870 088 5689 Fax No: 0870 706 2162
Current thread:
- SUMMARY: SMB overflow attacks Jason Coombs (Aug 29)
- RE: SUMMARY: SMB overflow attacks Jason Coombs (Aug 29)
- Re: SUMMARY: SMB overflow attacks Emeric Miszti (Aug 30)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: SUMMARY: SMB overflow attacks monti (Aug 30)
- RE: SUMMARY: SMB overflow attacks Dave Aitel (Aug 30)
- RE: SUMMARY: SMB overflow attacks Peter Gutmann (Aug 30)