Vulnerability Development mailing list archives

RE: Secure Yahoo logins


From: "Kayne Ian (Softlab)" <Ian.Kayne () softlab co uk>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 09:20:43 +0100

->

segment) or some sort of DNS diversion which would probably 
require you to have control of the necessary DNS servers.  At that 

DNS Cache poisoning is probably the easiest way of doing that to unsecured
DNS servers.

Ian Kayne
Technical Specialist - IT Solutions
Softlab Ltd - A BMW Company


-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Bremer [mailto:steveb () nebcoinc com]
Sent: 28 August 2002 17:34
To: nick () ethicsdesign com
Cc: vuln-dev () securityfocus com
Subject: Re: Secure Yahoo logins



If you can perform a mitm attack, there is no doubt you can read the 
traffic since you'll actually be decrypting it.  However, 
performing the 
mitm attack is the problem here.  With the exception of the recent 
browser flaws, it's not necessarily an easy attack.

You would have to find a way to get their browser to go to your 
machine in the first place.  This would require some sort of ARP 
spoofing (in which case you would need to be on their local network 
segment) or some sort of DNS diversion which would probably 
require you to have control of the necessary DNS servers.  At that 
point, you'd also have to deal with the warning the user would 
receive about an unsigned certificate being used (although this may 
not be difficult since many people click through the warnings).

There may be other (easier) methods as well, but I'm not aware of 
them.

Please enlighten me if I'm wrong.

Steve

On 28 Aug 2002 at 1:36, Nick Jacobsen wrote:

I just love this...  You are telling me that I can't sniff 
information
from an SSL session using a mitm attack?  the whole point 
is that you
are in the middle...  i.e. client connects to you and you coneect to
server, therefore the SSL session with the server is between you and
the server, not the client and the server...  you simply pass
everything on to the client as well, acting as the remote server... 
Try using ettercap, then tell me I am wrong...


Nick J.
Ethics Design
nick () ethicsdesign com
ethics () netzero net

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Thiel" <lx () redundancy redundancy org>
To: "Nick Jacobsen" <nick () ethicsdesign com>
Cc: <vuln-dev () securityfocus com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 9:06 PM
Subject: Re: Secure Yahoo logins


On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 08:36:40PM -0700, Nick Jacobsen wrote:
it supports SSH(Secure Telnet)

SSH is not even remotely like "Secure Telnet".

and SSL(HTTPS) decryption and sniffing, as

Only if you have the server's keypair.

I guess my main point is that if you are having your 
users log in
using "secure log in" for the express reason of making 
it so their
password
cannot
be sniffed, it is pointless, as anyone can STILL sniff it!

There's a higher difficulty level involved with MITM attacks, and
measures can be taken to prevent and/or recognize such 
attacks. SSL
is not a panacea, but it's a useful layer of security.  The fact
that MITM attacks exist is not proper rationale for abandoning the
use of encryption.






******************************************************************** 
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and 
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom 
they are addressed. 

If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for 
delivering to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received 
this email in error and that any use of the information contained within 
this email or attachments is strictly prohibited. 

Internet communications are not secure and Softlab does not accept 
any legal responsibility for the content of this message. Any opinions 
expressed in the email are those of the individual and not necessarily 
those of the Company. 

If you have received this email in error, or if you are concerned with 
the content of this email please notify the IT helpdesk by telephone 
on +44 (0)121 788 5480. 

********************************************************************


Current thread: