Vulnerability Development mailing list archives
Re: Challenge
From: "Kurt Seifried" <bugtraq () seifried org>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 20:00:08 -0600
We've struck Snakeoil boys (and gals)! To bad you can't bottle this stuff and sell it. Unless it's a one time pad (which it isn't) it's breakable (and even one time pads are if the data source isn't optimal). It is not under public scrutiny, just a rigged test (which for all we know is a file containing data from /dev/urandom) that will probably not be broken, which prooves nothing really (although the company will market it as "unbreakable". Judging from the number of bad grammatical errors on their website, the general style of prose, and the bold tags in (which thankfully won't show up): "Virtual Matrix Encryption (VME) is our proprietary technology. It's a completely new approach to data encryption. It has survived a battery of rigorous tests and challenges. Nobody has ever broken data encrypted with VME." What battery of rigorous tests and challenges (20+ years of public scrutiny... no. public scrutiny at all... no. closed scrutiny by firms such as RSA... doesn't say but I will bet no.). I won't be adding this to my crypto book online anytime soon. Kurt Seifried, kurt () seifried org A15B BEE5 B391 B9AD B0EF AEB0 AD63 0B4E AD56 E574 http://seifried.org/security/
Current thread:
- Challenge nocon (Apr 16)
- Re: Challenge Kurt Seifried (Apr 17)
- Re: Challenge Blue Boar (Apr 17)
- Re: Challenge Richard Masoner (Apr 17)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Challenge pierre . pfister (Apr 17)
- RE: Challenge seren geti (Apr 17)