Vulnerability Development mailing list archives
Re: xmalloc buffer overflow?
From: Christoph Moench-Tegeder <ry04 () rz uni-karlsruhe de>
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2001 20:00:32 +0100
## Robert Freeman (freem100 () chapman edu):
Can anybody else verify these results? It doesn't matter what `perl -e 'print "." x 90000000'` is appended to, I just chose vi (the vi buffer overflow being my inspiration). Please use the exploit responsibly; also if it is redundant, I apologize.
On "Linux cow 2.4.13 #1 SMP Wed Oct 24 11:29:32 CEST 2001 i686 unknown" with bash "GNU bash, version 2.05.0(1)-release (i386-pc-linux-gnu)" all I get is "bash: /usr/bin/vi: Argument list too long". With pdksh "PD KSH v5.2.14 99/07/13.2" I get "ksh: vi: Argument list too long" No root, no core, just an error. Regards, cmt -- Spare Space
Current thread:
- Vi buffer overflow KF (Nov 08)
- Re: Vi buffer overflow Jose Nazario (Nov 08)
- xmalloc buffer overflow? Robert Freeman (Nov 09)
- Re: xmalloc buffer overflow? dotslash (Nov 09)
- Re: xmalloc buffer overflow? Gwendolynn ferch Elydyr (Nov 09)
- Re: xmalloc buffer overflow? Christoph Moench-Tegeder (Nov 09)
- Re: xmalloc buffer overflow? Syzop (Nov 09)
- Re: xmalloc buffer overflow? Lucian Hudin (Nov 09)
- luser beeing able to kill random root owned procs (linux 2.2.20) ? Lucian Hudin (Nov 09)
- Re: xmalloc buffer overflow? Vasisht Tadigotla (Nov 09)
- Re: xmalloc buffer overflow? Kev (Nov 09)
- Re: xmalloc buffer overflow? dotslash (Nov 09)
- Re: Vi buffer overflow Rob Paisley (Nov 13)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: vi buffer overflow Kaneda Akira (Nov 09)
- Re: vi buffer overflow Emmanuel BENOIT (Nov 09)
- Re: vi buffer overflow Matias Sedalo (Nov 09)
- Re: vi buffer overflow Thomas Graf (Nov 09)
- Re: vi buffer overflow Emmanuel BENOIT (Nov 09)
(Thread continues...)