Vulnerability Development mailing list archives
Re: 'non-rfc' compliant ping command in win98/win2k - or?
From: ___cliff rayman___ <cliff () genwax com>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 11:40:36 -0700
u could load ethereal or use your favorite packet sniffer on your linux box. see what the difference in the packets actually is. "knud_erik højgaard" wrote:
1 cisco 677 with CBOS 2.3.0 --snip-- win95: router doesn't crash win98: router crashes winNT: router doesn't crash win2K: router crashes Linux: router doesn't crash, tried with hping2, no effect either. *BSD : router doesn't crash --snip-- Whats the difference? why is it there? does the ping command in 98/2k send 'illegal' data along with the packets? or are the others misbehaving? I have no idea.. maybe you do.
-- ___cliff rayman___cliff@genwax.com___http://www.genwax.com/
Current thread:
- 'non-rfc' compliant ping command in win98/win2k - or? knud_erik højgaard (Jul 31)
- Re: 'non-rfc' compliant ping command in win98/win2k - or? ___cliff rayman___ (Jul 31)