Vulnerability Development mailing list archives
Re: Unicode and IIS 2.0
From: w1re p4ir <w1rep4ir () DISINFO NET>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 21:00:20 -0000
IIS 2.0 Is vulnerable to the attack. I checked it running on a NT 4 server. Although i was having problems getting the tftp to connect to my server. Gave me weird reconnection issues. On Wed, 17 Jan 2001 16:22:14 +0100 Peter Osterberg <Peter_Osterberg () HOME SE> wrote:
Err, I've made some further digging today and found that it was a IIS 4.0 server although the banners reported IIS 2.0. Sincerely Peter Osterberg Dagaz AB At 21:48 2001-01-16, you wrote:Hi, during some activity today I found that IIS 2.0 also seems to be vulnerable to the unicode bug. I haven't been able to confirm that IIS 2.0 is installed on the remote site, but that is at least what the banners report. As I've followed the unicode thread I haven't seen that anyone has made this observation before. Sincerely, Peter Osterberg Dagaz AB ---------------------------------------------------------- Peter.Osterberg () dagaz se www.dagaz.se Slagthuset, Carlsgatan 12A, 10tr 211 20 Malmoe
_____________________________________________________________ Email your boss can't read - sign up for free disinfo.net email at http://www.disinfo.com, your gateway to the underground
Current thread:
- Unicode and IIS 2.0 Peter Osterberg (Jan 16)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Unicode and IIS 2.0 Peter Osterberg (Jan 17)
- Re: Unicode and IIS 2.0 w1re p4ir (Jan 17)