Re: Older BeroFTPD glob

["Eduardo Cruz" <eduardo.cruz () tsg com>]

I see a bit of non-good feelings in this message, anyway
Colors exist because people preffers one or another, if i took
my own "good-feelings" on using beroftpd is because i find it very
good (thanks to anyone that took part on the develop and u 2 of course)
So as bugs come up ill keep fixing them on the bero's i use.
And and i will not mind about sharing with the comunity a solution for a
problem.
(as i did on my last post attaching the glob.c fixed).

"People that helps people  = good stuff"
"People that blame people for helping out people = not good"

Again as colors exist, anyone can choose the one he likes.

Best regards, Edu.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Bernhard Rosenkraenzer" <bero () redhat de>
To: "Eduardo Cruz" <eduardo.cruz () tsg com>
Cc: "KF" <dotslash () snosoft com>; <vuln-dev () security-focus com>
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 1:05 AM
Subject: Re: Older BeroFTPD glob


> On Sun, 9 Dec 2001, Eduardo Cruz wrote:
>
> > just patch glob.c ur self, or use the mine already patched (attached).
> > And about the maintenance of beroftp, as far as i know is not being done
> > since years ago.
>
> I've stopped maintaining it when wu-ftpd moved to an open development
> model back in the days of 2.5.0 (even announced it). The current version
> of beroftpd IS wu-ftpd.
>
> There's no point in maintaining a fork once the project you forked accepts
> (your) patches.
>
> LLaP
> bero