Vulnerability Development mailing list archives
Re: smurf (stupid question)
From: Guilherme Mesquita <guy () linuxbr com br>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 23:27:46 -0700
Nope, since if you spoof from a broadcast, the destination broadcast will receive the ICMP-ECHO-REPLY and not the ICMP-ECHO-REQUEST. The maximum you can do is putting down an entire network using its broadcast from other broadcasts (or high bandwidth machines). .--------------------. | Guilherme Mesquita | | guy () linuxbr com br | | UIN # 5864338 | `--------------------' On Mon, 18 Sep 2000, Leon Rosenstein wrote:
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2000 09:38:08 -0400 To: VULN-DEV () SECURITYFOCUS COM From: Leon Rosenstein <l_rosenstein () MONTELSHOW COM> Reply-To: Leon Rosenstein <l_rosenstein () MONTELSHOW COM> Subject: smurf (stupid question) Ok before anyone even reads this post please note I am qualifying it as a stupid question so flames will not be appreciated. Also if this does not make the list I will understand. I was not really sure where to post it. I was wondering with smurf amplification attacks what would happen if you spoofed your IP as the broadcast address of another smurfable network. Would this cause an ICMP storm / war?? Would the two networks continousally just ping each other??? Anyway it was something I was wondering about. Please feel free to respond in public or private. Thx.
--
Current thread:
- smurf (stupid question) Leon Rosenstein (Sep 18)
- Re: smurf (stupid question) Michel Kaempf (Sep 19)
- Re: smurf (stupid question) alex (Sep 19)
- Re: smurf (stupid question) Lincoln Yeoh (Sep 19)
- Re: smurf (stupid question) Jacek Lipkowski (Sep 20)
- Re: smurf (stupid question) Holger van Koll (Sep 19)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: smurf (stupid question) Vitaly Osipov (Sep 19)
- Re: smurf (stupid question) Guilherme Mesquita (Sep 27)
- Re: smurf (stupid question) Michel Kaempf (Sep 19)