Vulnerability Development mailing list archives
Re: The NSA's Security-Enhanced Linux
From: "Michael H. Warfield" <mhw () WITTSEND COM>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2000 11:42:42 -0500
On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 05:18:42AM -0700, Scott D. Yelich wrote:
On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, Ralf-Philipp Weinmann wrote:citing http://www.nsa.gov/selinux/background.html: [...] The result is available for download at the above URL as well. Has anyone here toyed with it already ? Cheers, -Ralf
Seems like this is a "demo" ... would anyone be able to compare this system to a system that is not attempting to be a demo -- such as Pitbull (solaris?)? It frightens me to think that anyone would trust linux :-> but, alas, who knows. Maybe is enough sugar is poured on top, it just won't continue to smell so bad.
Huh? What was this? A troll? Must have been. Nobody could be that clueless... Ok... Let's nibble... The government seem to feel that it makes a lot MORE sense to trust something that they have the sources for and that they don't have to be held captive to a vendors path and fixes and support (or lack thereof). My God! Look at the mess Microsoft had in the version 1 security service provider. That wasn't getting fixed until the Samba team started kicking over those rocks and exposed it for the joke that it was... Solaris is rather precious, too... Took Sun over a year to fix the rsh hole that Alan Cox reported to them. Took them over 9 months to finally tell me that there would be no fix for the NISNuke problem and that they recommended installing open source versions of the finger daemon (they really made that recommendation). Frightens me that anyone would trust a closed source operating system for security. :-> (A trolling we will go, a trolling we will go, a hie ho the merry'o, a trolling we will go...)
Scott
Mike -- Michael H. Warfield | (770) 985-6132 | mhw () WittsEnd com (The Mad Wizard) | (678) 463-0932 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/ NIC whois: MHW9 | An optimist believes we live in the best of all PGP Key: 0xDF1DD471 | possible worlds. A pessimist is sure of it!
Current thread:
- The NSA's Security-Enhanced Linux Ralf-Philipp Weinmann (Dec 21)
- Re: The NSA's Security-Enhanced Linux Scott D. Yelich (Dec 22)
- Re: The NSA's Security-Enhanced Linux Michael H. Warfield (Dec 22)
- Re: The NSA's Security-Enhanced Linux Scott D. Yelich (Dec 22)
- Re: The NSA's Security-Enhanced Linux Michael H. Warfield (Dec 22)
- Re: The NSA's Security-Enhanced Linux Michael H. Warfield (Dec 22)
- Re: The NSA's Security-Enhanced Linux M Schubert (Dec 22)
- Re: The NSA's Security-Enhanced Linux Scott D. Yelich (Dec 22)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: The NSA's Security-Enhanced Linux Neal Dias (Dec 22)
- Re: The NSA's Security-Enhanced Linux Neal Dias (Dec 25)
- Re: The NSA's Security-Enhanced Linux Dom De Vitto (Dec 26)
- Re: The NSA's Security-Enhanced Linux Neal Dias (Dec 27)
- Re: The NSA's Security-Enhanced Linux Timothy J. Miller (Dec 28)
- Re: The NSA's Security-Enhanced Linux Scott D. Yelich (Dec 29)
- Re: The NSA's Security-Enhanced Linux M.Schubert (Dec 29)