Vulnerability Development mailing list archives

Securax Security Advisory: Windows98 contains a serious buffer overflow with long filenameextensions.

From: zoa_chien () INAME COM (Zoa_Chien)
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2000 19:18:32 +0200


<HR NOSHADE>
<UL>
<LI>text/plain attachment: scx-sa-02.txt
</UL>

Current thread:

No-Exec Stack Smashing 101 Granquist, Lamont (Apr 19)
- Re: No-Exec Stack Smashing 101 Crispin Cowan (Apr 19)
  - Re: No-Exec Stack Smashing 101 M.C.Mar (Apr 20)
    - Re: No-Exec Stack Smashing 101 M.C.Mar (Apr 20)
    - Re: No-Exec Stack Smashing 101 Granquist, Lamont (Apr 20)
    - Re: No-Exec Stack Smashing 101 M.C.Mar (Apr 20)
    - Re: No-Exec Stack Smashing 101 Granquist, Lamont (Apr 20)
    - Re: No-Exec Stack Smashing 101 Mariusz Woloszyn (Apr 21)
    - Securax Security Advisory: Windows98 contains a serious buffer overflow with long filenameextensions. Zoa_Chien (Apr 21)
    - Re: Securax Security Advisory: Windows98 contains a serious buffer overflow with long filenameextensions. Bob Fiero (Apr 21)
    - Re: Securax Security Advisory: Windows98 contains a serious buffer overflow with long filenameextensions. Ron DuFresne (Apr 21)
    - Re: Securax Security Advisory: Windows98 contains a serious buffer overflow with long filenameextensions. Zoa_Chien (Apr 21)
    - Re: Securax Security Advisory: Windows98 contains a seriousbuffer overflow with long filenameextensions. Markus Kern (Apr 22)
    - Re: Securax Security Advisory: Windows98 contains a seriousbuffer overflow with long filenameextensions. Zoa_Chien (Apr 23)
    - koules again Kotz (Apr 21)
    - Re: koules again Ron DuFresne (Apr 21)
    - Re: No-Exec Stack Smashing 101 Granquist, Lamont (Apr 25)
    - Re: No-Exec Stack Smashing 101 M.C.Mar (Apr 26)
    - limited functionality accounts (was: Re: History Files) Alex Andrews (Apr 25)

(Thread continues...)