tcpdump mailing list archives
Re: [OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-pcapng-00.txt
From: Michael Tuexen via tcpdump-workers <tcpdump-workers () lists tcpdump org>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2023 22:05:11 +0100
--- Begin Message --- From: Michael Tuexen <michael.tuexen () lurchi franken de>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2023 22:05:11 +0100
On 25. Jan 2023, at 21:33, Carsten Bormann <cabo () tzi org> wrote: On 25. Jan 2023, at 17:42, Michael Richardson <mcr () sandelman ca> wrote:I am not sure that pcap*NG* is so incredibly established that we can't change it. I just hate "Next Generation" for anything, particularly when time moves on. What about if we kept N and G, but changed what they meant?(SenML started as an XML vocabulary, but now is mostly JSON and CBOR — so we turned the “ML” into “Measurement Lists”. Which is somewhat bizarre, but keeps the acronym. For retronyming PCAPNG, what is central to PCAPNG that would explain the P, N, and G?)pcap, now generalized? Best regards MichaelGrüße, Carsten _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG () ietf org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________ tcpdump-workers mailing list tcpdump-workers () lists tcpdump org https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers
Current thread:
- Re: [OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-pcapng-00.txt Guy Harris via tcpdump-workers (Jan 24)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-pcapng-00.txt Michael Tuexen via tcpdump-workers (Jan 25)