tcpdump mailing list archives
Re: [RFC PATCH] Add new `pcap_set_buffer_size1` API.
From: Mario Rugiero <mrugiero () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2019 22:40:32 -0300
El mié., 2 oct. 2019 a las 19:48, Mario Rugiero (<mrugiero () gmail com>) escribió:
I used '1' because that's what Linux does when advertising newer versions of syscalls. '_ext' does look better, I think I'd go with that.
On the other hand, numeric versioning is more future-proof. 'pcap_set_buffer_size_ext_ext_ext wouldn't look good. _______________________________________________ tcpdump-workers mailing list tcpdump-workers () lists tcpdump org https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers
Current thread:
- [RFC PATCH] Add new `pcap_set_buffer_size1` API. mrugiero (Oct 02)
- Re: [RFC PATCH] Add new `pcap_set_buffer_size1` API. Guy Harris (Oct 02)
- Re: [RFC PATCH] Add new `pcap_set_buffer_size1` API. Mario Rugiero (Oct 02)
- Re: [RFC PATCH] Add new `pcap_set_buffer_size1` API. Mario Rugiero (Oct 02)
- Re: [RFC PATCH] Add new `pcap_set_buffer_size1` API. Guy Harris (Oct 03)
- Re: [RFC PATCH] Add new `pcap_set_buffer_size1` API. Guy Harris (Oct 03)
- Re: [RFC PATCH] Add new `pcap_set_buffer_size1` API. Mario Rugiero (Oct 03)
- Re: [RFC PATCH] Add new `pcap_set_buffer_size1` API. Mario Rugiero (Oct 02)
- Re: [RFC PATCH] Add new `pcap_set_buffer_size1` API. Guy Harris (Oct 02)