tcpdump mailing list archives
Re: bad soname for libpcap.so.1.6.2 ?
From: ikuzar RABE <ikuzar9295 () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 16:45:35 +0200
Ok, I work on Debian. But why each distribution does not follow libpcap writer (tcpdump dev team) from the begining ? Is there something which leads each distro to write their own soname ? Why isn't there an unique soname for all distro 2016-05-06 19:18 GMT+02:00 hans <hans () stare cz>:
On May 06 17:37:51, rfrancoise () debian org wrote:is normal that soname of libpcap.so.1.6.2 is libpcap.so.0.8 ?This is specific to Debian and its derivatives, for more details see: https://people.debian.org/~rfrancoise/libpcap-faq.htmlAnd it's /usr/lib/libpcap.so.8.1 on current OpenBSD http://www.openbsd.org/faq/ports/specialtopics.html#SharedLibs _______________________________________________ tcpdump-workers mailing list tcpdump-workers () lists tcpdump org https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers
_______________________________________________ tcpdump-workers mailing list tcpdump-workers () lists tcpdump org https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers
Current thread:
- bad soname for libpcap.so.1.6.2 ? ikuzar RABE (May 06)
- Re: bad soname for libpcap.so.1.6.2 ? Romain Francoise (May 06)
- Re: bad soname for libpcap.so.1.6.2 ? hans (May 06)
- Re: bad soname for libpcap.so.1.6.2 ? ikuzar RABE (May 10)
- Re: bad soname for libpcap.so.1.6.2 ? Lukas Tribus (May 10)
- Re: bad soname for libpcap.so.1.6.2 ? hans (May 06)
- Re: bad soname for libpcap.so.1.6.2 ? Romain Francoise (May 06)