tcpdump mailing list archives
Re: Missing packet fields in big endian with ath9k
From: Luis Correia <lfpcorreia () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 19:50:16 +0100
Hi Michael, thnks for replying. I check for link type this way: (pcap_datalink(dev_handler) == DLT_IEEE802_11) , So i'm pretty sure its the right data link. Unless pcap_datalink() is broken.. Meanwhile I've media some progress by looking at iwcap (https://dev.openwrt.org/browser/trunk/package/iwcap/src/iwcap.c?rev=30747) specifically, by using #define FRAMETYPE_MASK 0xFC #define FRAMETYPE_BEACON 0x80 #define FRAMETYPE_DATA 0x08 #define FRAMETYPE_PROBREQ 0x40 and testing with this: u8 frametype = *(u8 *)(data + radio_len); if ((frametype & FRAMETYPE_MASK) == FRAMETYPE_PROBREQ) { cout << "len: " << radio_len << endl; cout << ether_ntoa((struct ether_addr *) p->add1) << " " << ether_ntoa((struct ether_addr *) p->add2) << " " << ether_ntoa((struct ether_addr *) p->add3) << endl; } I manage to print the packets I'm interested in. However I still can't access the RSSI value of the packet.. Is it the [byte data] & FRAMETYPE_MASK (0xFC) logic operation that does the "magic"? I don't have enough knowledge to understand what the operation does.. Do you have and care to explain? If I type cast the radio tap struct and do the same thin on the rssi field ( ssi_signal & FRAMETYPE_MASK) does the result equals the rssi signal in decimal?! Thnks in advance On Apr 26, 2013, at 7:16 PM, Michael Richardson <mcr () sandelman ca> wrote:
It sounds like you are not taking into account the link type. EN10B and LINUX encapsulations are different. "tcpdump" without any arguments listens on "any" interface, which is a cooked "LINUX" encapsulation. I' doubt that the one on openwrt does the same thing. -- ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [ ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | network architect [ ] mcr () sandelman ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
_______________________________________________ tcpdump-workers mailing list tcpdump-workers () lists tcpdump org https://lists.sandelman.ca/mailman/listinfo/tcpdump-workers
Current thread:
- Missing packet fields in big endian with ath9k Luis Correia (Apr 26)
- Re: Missing packet fields in big endian with ath9k Michael Richardson (Apr 26)
- Re: Missing packet fields in big endian with ath9k Luis Correia (Apr 26)
- Re: Missing packet fields in big endian with ath9k Guy Harris (Apr 26)
- Re: Missing packet fields in big endian with ath9k Luis Correia (Apr 27)
- Re: Missing packet fields in big endian with ath9k Guy Harris (Apr 27)
- Re: Missing packet fields in big endian with ath9k Luís Correia (Apr 28)
- Re: Missing packet fields in big endian with ath9k Guy Harris (Apr 28)
- Re: Missing packet fields in big endian with ath9k Mike Kershaw / Dragorn (Apr 28)
- Re: Missing packet fields in big endian with ath9k Guy Harris (Apr 28)
- Re: Missing packet fields in big endian with ath9k Guy Harris (Apr 28)
- Re: Missing packet fields in big endian with ath9k Guy Harris (Apr 28)
- Re: Missing packet fields in big endian with ath9k Luis Correia (Apr 26)
- Re: Missing packet fields in big endian with ath9k Michael Richardson (Apr 26)
- Re: Missing packet fields in big endian with ath9k Michael Richardson (May 01)