Re: Request for new DLT value for Wireshark Dissector

[Schemmel, Hans-Christoph <Hans-Christoph.Schemmel () cinterion com>]

Guy Harris <guy <at> alum.mit.edu> writes:

>  should I just describe the holes as "other data", so you're not
> constrained to forever make them all be AT command/response text, or is it
guaranteed (now and forever) to
> be AT-command-or-response text?-

The description of the holes as "other data" sounds good for me.

Kind regards,
Christoph Schemmel




-
This is the tcpdump-workers list.
Visit https://cod.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe.