tcpdump mailing list archives
Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2]: hw timestamp support
From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2 () hp com>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 09:49:48 -0700
Guy Harris wrote:
Is there ever any reason *NOT* to use the hardware timestamp if it's available?
Only if it and the host time are not sufficiently in sync and you want to correlate with other things timestamped with host time.
rick jones - This is the tcpdump-workers list. Visit https://cod.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe.
Current thread:
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2]: hw timestamp support, (continued)
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2]: hw timestamp support yon ar c'hall (May 25)
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2]: hw timestamp support Mcmillan, Scott A (May 25)
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2]: hw timestamp support Darren Reed (May 25)
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2]: hw timestamp support Mcmillan, Scott A (May 26)
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2]: hw timestamp support Darren Reed (May 26)
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2]: hw timestamp support Mcmillan, Scott A (May 25)
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2]: hw timestamp support yon ar c'hall (May 25)
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2]: hw timestamp support Mcmillan, Scott A (May 26)
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2]: hw timestamp support Aaron Turner (May 26)
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2]: hw timestamp support Guy Harris (May 28)
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2]: hw timestamp support Mcmillan, Scott A (Jun 01)
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2]: hw timestamp support Mcmillan, Scott A (Jun 03)