tcpdump mailing list archives
Re: What is the main reason in absent append capabilities
From: Ed Maste <emaste () phaedrus sandvine ca>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:06:00 -0500
On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 10:56:26AM -0800, Guy Harris wrote:
Mikhail Manuylov wrote:All I wonder is why tcpdump still hasn't any binary dump append feature.Because nobody who needed that capability wrote code to implement it and contributed it to tcpdump-workers?
I've just discovered that our local tree (at my work) has a patch to implement this functionality. Unfortuantely it's not quite complete; it doesn't check that the new link layer type is the same as the one in the existing capture file. I'll have a go at fixing it up and making it available. -ed - This is the tcpdump-workers list. Visit https://lists.sandelman.ca/ to unsubscribe.
Current thread:
- What is the main reason in absent append capabilities of tcpdump and libpcap? Mikhail Manuylov (Feb 16)
- Re: What is the main reason in absent append capabilities Guy Harris (Feb 16)
- Re: What is the main reason in absent append capabilities Ed Maste (Feb 16)
- Re: What is the main reason in absent append capabilities Mikhail Manuylov (Feb 17)
- Re: What is the main reason in absent append capabilities Ed Maste (Feb 16)
- Re: What is the main reason in absent append Stephen Donnelly (Feb 16)
- Re: What is the main reason in absent append Guy Harris (Feb 16)
- Re: What is the main reason in absent append Christian Kreibich (Feb 20)
- Message not available
- Re: What is the main reason in absent append Mikhail Manuylov (Feb 27)
- Re: What is the main reason in absent append Mikhail Manuylov (Feb 27)
- Re: What is the main reason in absent append Guy Harris (Feb 16)
- Re: What is the main reason in absent append capabilities Guy Harris (Feb 16)